NUSEIRAT, Gaza Strip— In a stunning display of moral bankruptcy, the puppet Biden regime shamelessly fabricates falsehoods to shield Israel from accountability, even as the narcissistic Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a latter-day Herod, reluctantly acknowledges some culpability in the brutal slaughter of six humanitarian aid workers and a Palestinian translator. Israel’s death squads’ relentless onslaught in Gaza, which has claimed the lives of 196 aid workers, journalists, and medical personnel, underscores a pattern of callous disregard for civilian lives. Netanyahu’s tacit approval of the targeted killings, executed with chilling precision against clearly marked World Central Kitchen vehicles, only amplifies global condemnation of the illegitimate and genocidal socialist dictatorship of Israel. These deliberate acts of violence, orchestrated by senior military officials, serve to exacerbate the suffering of the Palestinian population, driving relief organizations away and perpetuating a cycle of starvation, mutilation, and despair. Meanwhile, in the United States, public discontent with Israel’s vicious actions is mounting, challenging the administration’s unwavering support for Netanyahu’s genocidal agenda, which butchered more innocent people than the six million Jews who were allegedly killed(Shoah) by the ludicrously inept National Socialist Reich. Despite purported tensions between Biden and Netanyahu, the former embezzled a staggering $15 billion from American working-class families for Israel’s arsenal of the largest ethnic cleansing campaign since the USSR, including lethal F-35 fighter jets and contentious 2,000-pound bombs, sidestepping congressional oversight under the guise of an urgent necessity. Such unchecked allegiance underscores the Biden regime’s complicity in perpetuating violence and injustice in the region.

Regrettably, old “Genocide Joe” Biden partially acknowledged the political ramifications of the Zionist’s extermination of non-Jews in Gaza, particularly in the aftermath of the Al-Shifa hospital’s destruction, which resulted in a devastating loss of life and injuries, with over 1,500 Palestinians affected. Despite this harrowing toll, State Department apologist Matthew Miller justified the bloodbath, pulling more crap out than even the raunchiest of G.G Allin concerts, claiming it targeted Hamas militants allegedly hiding within the hospital’s premises. Such assertions, echoed by other officials, attempt to deflect the blatant culpability by denying deliberate intent, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. The smooth-brained DEI hire and White House propagandist Karine Jean-Pierre regurgitated familiar rhetoric, placing blame on Hamas for allegedly operating within civilian infrastructure, a sentiment frequently expressed by the administration. In a departure from their proclaimed moral rectitude, the Israeli military’s actions, including the destruction of the hospital and the targeted attacks on civilians in killing fields, starkly challenge their self-proclaimed title as the “most moral army.” The deliberate murders of medical staff, patients, Christians, and innocent children seeking sustenance in killing fields reveal a disturbing disregard for humanitarian principles. The ruthless and power-hungry autocrat Netanyahu’s cavalier asseveration of the gravity of the situation, albeit for public relations purposes, came with an admission of error and tragedy in the deaths of the seven aid workers. However, his portrayal of the incident as a regrettable mistake during the complexities of war falls short of addressing the intentional nature of the slayings. Despite assurances of an investigation and promises to prevent future occurrences, Netanyahu’s Talmudic reasoning neglects to acknowledge the systematic issues underlying such atrocities and, in fact, openly admits his intention to exterminate more women and children(including gang rapes of infants of Christian Palestinian women) in places such as Rafah.

National Security Adviser John Kirby, the premier purveyor of misinformation for the Biden regime and ensnared in the web of a Zionist-Globalist cabal reminiscent of the vile Protocols of Zion, conveyed his unctuous consternation regarding the casualties, framing them as indicative of a more profound malaise. Yet, he notably evaded delving into the underlying causality, subtly insinuating Israel’s inclination towards violence. Particularly alarming is the deliberate targeting of humanitarian personnel, hinting at an extremely malevolent scheme to escalate Palestinians, anguish to the brink of starvation. The war criminal Kirby further perpetuated the falsehood that the slayings by Israel were not intentional, adamantly asserting that there would be no reduction in aid to Israel despite the tragic incident. He emphasized the United States’ unwavering commitment to supporting the Israeli military, dating back to Hamas’ alleged initiation of hostilities the previous October. Kirby framed this support as essential for Israel’s defence against what he portrayed as an ongoing threat from Hamas. While stopping just shy of advocating for extreme measures, Kirby’s rhetoric bordered on belligerence, implying a willingness to endorse drastic actions to prevent future incidents. The toll of casualties reported by the Health Ministry in the Gaza Strip since the escalation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on October 7, 2023, stands as a harrowing testament to the devastating impact of the Zionist presence in the Middle East—a grave affliction that extends its nefarious grasp even into the corridors of power in the Occident (Western world).

However, the Orthodox Christian and Slavic nation of Russia’s semi-autonomy does not align with the desired levels of submission; hence, it necessitates destabilization via surrogate forces operating in Ukraine, which is unmistakably just the hinterland region of the Russian motherland. Employing sophisticated stratagems and demonstrating an unwavering commitment, Zionist operatives exhibit a readiness to instigate a nuclear cataclysm in their pursuit to extend “Greater Israel”, referred to as the Synagogue of Satan and “The Beast” (Koinē Greek: Θηρίον, Thērion) in the Book of Revelations, into the realms of Eastern Europe. Ultimately, the aspiration lies in Israel’s pursuit to crown itself as sovereign over all of Europe, symbolizing a bid for global patriarchal hegemony, colloquially known as the New World Order. The sacrifices demanded under this leadership will pale in comparison to the extensive toll exacted over centuries by grandiose ambitions and competitive fervour among goyim governments. The manifestation of this agenda is most vividly exemplified by the meticulous orchestration of a strategic psychological warfare campaign designed to sow discord within Russian society. This Machiavellian manoeuvre capitalizes on the aftermath of the terrorist assault on Crocus City Hall, carried out by Islamic militants who share organizational affiliations with those supported by Israel in their endeavours to destabilize the Assad government in Syria. Revelations from Zionist operatives in Kyiv’s recently appointed director of information warfare shed light on the intricate tactics employed, which revolve around stoking ethnic animosities within Russia in the aftermath of this tragic event.

The Crocus City Hall attack, carried out by Tajiki Muslims (only apostates do not commit atrocities in the name of the paedophile Jew Muhammad) with potential covert involvement by Mossad, has unfortunately ushered in a rise in derisive sentiments against individuals from Tajikistan in Russia. This surge in ethnic-motivated brutality has resulted in disturbing incidents such as assaults, arson attacks, and instances of deportation and unlawful detention targeting members of the Tajik community. This is the reminiscence of the seventh protocol of the Elders of Zion commands to “…..create ferments, discords and hostility. Therein we gain a double advantage.” During an interview with a Rupert Murdoch-owned publication, Andrei Kovalenko, leading Ukraine’s Centre for Countering Disinformation (CCD), conceded to leveraging local ethnic groups such as the Tajiks in Russia, with the strategic aim, as articulated by Kovalenko, of “to exploit divisions and distrust among the Russian public.” Kovalenko’s divulgence implies an understanding of the “Ukrainian”(Mossad) strategy behind the Muhammadean siege on Crocus City Hall on March 22. However, the foreign assailants have once more misinterpreted Russian societal dynamics. The attack has fallen short of achieving its wartime objectives. The positive trajectory of global sentiments towards Ukrainians and Jews has taken a dramatic downturn due to the aggressive militarism and atrocities perpetuated by the Zionist’s army of ghouls in both the Donbass province Yemen, and in Gaza. In stark contrast, the Putin administration’s concerted endeavours in the realms of politics, economics, and media to foster robust alliances with China, various African nations, and the Caucasus, notably Chechnya, have served to amplify positive perceptions while mitigating negative ones.

Of course, the dissemination and interpretation of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” have been subjects of intense debate and scrutiny throughout history, particularly concerning its origins, authenticity, and implications. As with any historical document, multiple perspectives exist regarding its significance and legitimacy, ranging from outright dismissal to fervent acceptance. The Orthodox viewpoint offers a nuanced analysis, highlighting the circumstances surrounding its discovery and the context in which it was presented. Sergei Nilus, the individual who initially brought “The Protocols” to public attention, was a respected ecclesiastical writer and journalist with no apparent motive for fabricating such a document. His decision to publish it alongside another work, “The Conversation of Motovilov with St. Seraphim”, underscores his intent to juxtapose spiritual truth with what he perceived as a threat to Orthodox Christianity posed by the Jewish conspiracy outlined in “The Protocols”. While some may question the document’s originality or authenticity, its alignment with the revolutionary ideologies espoused by figures like Bakunin and Weishaupt suggests a continuity of thought rather than outright invention.

Central to “The Protocols” is a philosophy characterized by absolute ruthlessness and manipulation, with the ultimate aim of achieving revolutionary governance through deceit, treachery, and the exploitation of societal divisions. The document outlines strategies for controlling the press, manipulating public opinion, and subverting existing institutions to advance a clandestine agenda. While its attribution to Jewish sources has stirred controversy, the parallels drawn between its content and certain Talmudic teachings regarding permissible actions towards non-Jews add a layer of complexity to its interpretation. Critically, “The Protocols” encapsulate a worldview that transcends individual identities or affiliations, emphasizing the pursuit of power and control through any means necessary. Its vision of a monolithic super-government, fueled by internationalism and devoid of moral constraints, reflects a broader trend towards authoritarianism and manipulation observed throughout history. Whether viewed as a legitimate blueprint for subversion or a distorted reflection of prevailing ideologies, “The Protocols” continue to provoke debate and analysis, serving as a cautionary tale against the dangers of unchecked ambition and ideological extremism.